NYSE Restricts Broker Discretionary Voting

On January 25, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) issued Information Memo 12-4, which announced significant limitations on the ability of member brokers to vote customer shares without specific instructions from their clients. Previously, the NYSE permitted brokers to vote uninstructed shares with respect to certain corporate governance matters proposals when the proposal in question was supported by the issuer’s management. Going forward, absent specific instructions from customers, brokers will no longer be allowed to vote customer shares with respect to various corporate governance proposals, including proposals to de-stagger the board of directors, regarding majority voting in the election of directors, eliminating supermajority voting requirements, providing for the use of consents, providing rights to call a special meeting, and certain types of anti-takeover provision overrides.
 

Continue Reading...

Delaware Chancery Court Provides Clarity on Default Fiduciary Duties Owed by a Manager of a Limited Liability Company

On January 27, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware found that a manager of a limited liability company owes traditional fiduciary duties of loyalty and care unless the limited liability company’s operating agreement specifically modifies or eliminates such duties.

Continue Reading...

SEC Reduces Exchange Act Fees for Securities Transactions

Co-authored by Daniel J. Silverthorn.

On January 20, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, effective February 21, most Securities Act of 1934 transaction fees will decrease from $19.20 per million dollars to $18.00 per million dollars. The assessment on security futures transactions will remain unchanged at $0.0042 for each round turn transaction. The SEC had previously announced fee rates for fiscal year 2012 on May 2, 2011, but these fee rates never became effective.

Continue Reading...

SEC Releases Updated Schedule to Implement Certain Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz.

On January 6, the Securities and Exchange Commission again updated its planned schedule for adopting rules and taking other actions to implement the corporate governance and disclosure provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). As reported in the April 15 and August 5 editions of the Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, the SEC has on several occasions announced revised planned rulemaking schedules to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Below are the updated time periods set forth in the SEC’s current rulemaking schedule for governance and disclosure rules to be proposed and adopted during such time periods, as well as certain related actions. Section references are to the Dodd-Frank Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Adopts Revised Net Worth Standard for Accredited Investors

Co-authored by James B. Anderson.

On December 21, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted an amendment to the accredited investor net worth standard under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to exclude the value of an individual’s primary residence from the $1 million net worth calculations used to determine whether such individual is an “accredited investor” qualified to invest in certain unregistered securities offerings. The amendment conforms the SEC’s definition of an “accredited investor” to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act).

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues Final Mine Safety Disclosure Rules Under Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by Kari E. Hoelting.

On December 21, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules (the Final Rules) implementing Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), which included disclosure requirements for operators of coal or other mines.

 

Continue Reading...

SEC Staff to Release Filing Review Correspondence Earlier

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On December 1, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that, “to further enhance the transparency of the filing review process,” effective January 1, 2012, it will release (through the EDGAR system) comment letters and response letters relating to filings reviewed by the Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management no earlier than 20 business days following completion of a filing review.

Continue Reading...

SEC Limits Availability of Review for Non-Public Submissions by Foreign Private Issuers

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On December 8, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance announced that it will limit the circumstances in which it will review initial registrations statements of foreign private issuers that are submitted to the staff on a non-public basis.

Continue Reading...

SEC Staff Delays Move to International Accounting Standards

Co-authored by Daniel J. Silverthorn.

On December 5, the chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission, James L. Kroeker, stated in a speech before the National Conference of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that the SEC’s staff will need “a few additional months” to prepare a final report concerning a possible incorporation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for U.S. issuers. Kroeker noted that he was encouraged about the potential prospects of IFRS incorporation in the United States, and stated that creating a strong and lasting framework was more important than a rapid timeframe for adoption and implementation.

Continue Reading...

ISS Publishes Updates to Proxy Voting Policies

Co-authored by Michelle Griswold.

On November 17, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published updates to its proxy voting policies, which will be effective for meetings held on or after February 1, 2012.

Continue Reading...

House Approves Bills Providing Crowdfunding and Solicitation Exemptions

Co-authored by Kari E. Hoelting

On November 3 the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2930 (the “Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act”) and H.R. 2940 (the “Access to Capital for Job Creators Act”).

Continue Reading...

SEC Approves New Exchange Rules to Toughen Listing Standards for Reverse Merger Companies

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On November 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved new rules proposed by the New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Amex LLC and the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC that toughen the listing standards for issuers that become public through reverse mergers. A reverse merger is a transaction in which an unlisted private operating company becomes public via a merger with a publicly traded shell company, which is generally a company with no material business operations.

Continue Reading...

SEC's Division of Corporation Finance Issues Bulletin Regarding Shareholder Proposals

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On October 18, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a legal bulletin (No. 14F) providing guidance relating to shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This bulletin discusses the staff’s reversal of its position regarding proof of ownership for shareholder proposals, clarifies the treatment of revised shareholder proposals, provides guidance on common errors shareholders can avoid when submitting proof of ownership to issuers, clarifies procedures for withdrawing no-action requests for proposals submitted by multiple proponents, and outlines the SEC’s use of email to transmit no-action responses.

Continue Reading...

House Committee Approves "Facebook" Bill

On October 26 the House Committee on Financial Services approved H.R. 2167 (the “Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act”) and sent the Bill to the House floor.

Continue Reading...

ISS Publishes Proposed Changes to Proxy Voting Policies

On October 18, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published for comment proposed changes to its proxy voting policies for 2012. ISS’ proposed policy updates for 2012 include the following:

Continue Reading...

SEC's Division of Corporation Finance Issues Bulletin Regarding Legal and Tax Opinions

On October 14, the staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a legal bulletin (No. 19) regarding legality and tax opinions filed in connection with registered offerings of securities. The bulletin covers the requirements for these opinions, the staff’s views regarding the required elements for these opinions and the staff’s practices in reviewing them.

Continue Reading...

PCAOB Solicits Comments on Proposed Amendments to Improve Audit Transparency

Authored by Michelle Griswold.

On October 11, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) requested public comment on several proposed amendments to PCAOB standards designed to increase transparency of public company audits.

Continue Reading...

SEC's Division of Corporation Finance Issues Cybersecurity Disclosure Guidance

On October 13 the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued disclosure guidance to assist registrants “in assessing what, if any, disclosures should be provided about cybersecurity matters in light of each registrant’s specific facts and circumstances.”

Continue Reading...

SEC to Hold Roundtable to Discuss Conflict Mineral Rulemaking

Authored by David Kravitz.

On September 29, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it will host a public roundtable on October 18 to discuss the SEC’s rulemaking under Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. As described in the December 17, 2010, edition of Corporate & Financial Weekly Digest, on December 15, 2010 the SEC issued proposed rules implementing disclosure and reporting requirements regarding the use by issuers of conflict minerals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Continue Reading...

ISS Survey on Current Governmental and Compensation Policy Issues

In a report released on September 26, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. released its 2011-2012 Policy Survey Summary of Results (the Survey).

Continue Reading...

SEC Announces Roundtable on Microcap Securities

Co-authored by James Anderson

On September 19, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it will host a public roundtable to discuss the regulatory issues surrounding the execution, clearance and settlement of “microcap securities,” low-priced stocks issued by companies with small capitalizations that trade primarily on the OTC Bulletin Board or OTC Quote (previously Pink Sheets). The roundtable will take place on October 17 at the SEC’s Washington D.C. headquarters. The topics expected to be discussed include some key regulatory issues such as anti-money laundering monitoring, compliance challenges and potential changes to the regulatory framework. Panelists will include representatives from The Deposit Trust Company, broker-dealers and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The SEC’s press release states that the purpose of the roundtable is to “gather ideas and request input,” which may lead to regulatory changes affecting the execution, clearance and settlement of low-priced securities.

Click here for the SEC’s press release announcing the roundtable.
 

SEC Announces Creation of Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies

Co-authored by Jonathan Weiner

On September 13, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the formation of an Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies. According to the SEC, the committee is intended to facilitate advice and recommendations specifically related to privately held businesses and publicly traded companies with market capitalizations of less than $250 million.

Continue Reading...

SEC Will Not Appeal Proxy Access Decision; Rule 14a-8 Amendment To Become Effective

Mary Schapiro, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, announced this week that the SEC will not appeal the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision vacating SEC Rule 14a-11, which would have required companies to include shareholders’ director nominees in company proxy statements. In her announcement, SEC Chairman Schapiro stated that the SEC will continue to seek to provide “a meaningful opportunity for shareholders to exercise their right to nominate directors” and is analyzing the U.S. Court of Appeal’s objections and continuing to review comments previously received on Rule 14a 11.

Continue Reading...

SEC Lowers Listing Fees for Fiscal Year 2012

Co-authored by Daniel Silverthorn

Effective October 1, the fees that public companies and other issuers pay to register their securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission will decrease from $116.10 per million dollars to $114.60 per million dollars. This fee rate is applicable to the registration of securities under Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, the repurchase of securities under Section 13(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control transactions under Section 14(g) of the Exchange Act.

Click here for the SEC’s fee rate advisory.
 

SEC Recoups Bonus of Former Beazer Executive Under Sarbanes-Oxley

Co-authored by Daniel Silverthorn

On August 30, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a settlement with the former chief financial officer of Beazer Homes USA to recover more than $1.4 million in bonus and stock profits that he received after the home builder filed fraudulent financial statements during fiscal year 2006.

Continue Reading...

PCAOB Solicits Comments on Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation

Co-authored by: Palash I. Pandya

On August 16, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) issued a Concept Release in which it proposed mandatory audit firm rotation as a method to enhance auditor independence, objectivity and professional skepticism. The PCAOB stated that its inspections frequently indicated audit deficiencies that may be attributable to a failure by an audit firm to exercise the required independence, professional skepticism and objectivity by putting the interests of company management before that of investors. The PCAOB stated that a mandatory audit firm rotation requirement, by ending an audit firm's ability to turn each new engagement into a long term income stream, could fundamentally change an audit firm's relationship with its audit client and might, as a result, significantly enhance the audit firm's ability to serve as an independent gatekeeper.

Continue Reading...

NYSE Proposes Tougher Listing Standards for Issuers Following Reverse Mergers

Co-authored by: Robert Wild and David Kravitz

On August 4, the New York Stock Exchange LLC filed a proposed rule change with the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt additional initial listing requirements for companies that have become public through transactions in which unlisted private operating companies merge into publicly traded shell companies, commonly known as reverse mergers. The proposed amendments are similar to rules proposed by the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and described in the April 29 edition of the Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest.

Continue Reading...

SEC's New Whistleblower Rules in Effect

On August 12, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new whistleblower rules went into effect. The whistleblower rules were described in the May 27 edition of the Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest. In addition, the SEC activated a new “Office of the Whistleblower” web page for submission of tips and to provide other information on the whistleblower rules.

To view the whistleblower web page, click here.

Court Provides Clarification on Short Swing Profit Rules

Co-authored by David A. Pentlow, Robert J. Wild and Kari E. Hoelting

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a claim brought under Section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, finding that the sale and purchase within six months of two different series of common stock traded under different ticker symbols and not otherwise convertible into one another or derivatives of one another did not constitute the “purchase and sale, or any sale and purchase, of any equity security” under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Further Delays Planned Rulemaking Schedule to Implement Certain Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by David A. Pentlow, Robert J. Wild and James B. Anderson

On July 29, the Securities and Exchange Commission once again updated its planned schedule for adopting rules and taking other actions to implement the corporate governance and disclosure provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. As reported in the April 15, 2011, edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, the SEC had previously announced its revised planned rulemaking schedule to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Below are updated time periods set forth in the SEC’s further revised rulemaking schedule for governance and disclosure rules to be adopted during such time periods, as well as certain related actions. Section references are to the Dodd-Frank Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Adopts Rules Removing Credit Ratings as Short-Form Eligibility Criteria

Co-authored by David A. Pentlow, Robert J. Wild and David S. Kravitz.

On July 26, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules removing credit ratings as one of the several alternative “transaction” eligibility criteria for companies seeking to use short-form registration statements when registering primary offerings of non-convertible securities. The new rules were adopted pursuant to Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which required U.S. Federal agencies to remove references to, or requirement of reliance on, credit ratings from their regulations and replace such ratings with a standard of credit-worthiness that the agency deemed appropriate.

Continue Reading...

Court Vacates Shareholder Nomination Rule

On July 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated Rule 14a-11 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Rule 14a-11 permitted certain shareholders of public companies to nominate candidates for the board of directors outside a company's normal nomination process. The court held that the SEC was "arbitrary and capricious in promulgating Rule 14a-11" and thus violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and failed to adequately consider the rule's effect upon efficiency, competition and capital formation as required by Section 3(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 2(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 10-1305 (D.C. Cir.)
 

Executive Order Directs Independent Agencies to Perform Cost-Benefit Analysis of Regulation

On July 11, President Barack Obama signed an Executive Order directing “independent regulatory agencies”, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and several other federal agencies, to comply, to the extent permitted by law, with Executive Order 13563. Executive Order 13563, which the President signed on January 18, directed federal agencies, other than independent regulatory agencies, to engage in a cost-benefit analysis, with the participation of the public, of proposed and existing regulation and to develop means to better coordinate regulation across multiple agencies.

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues New Interpretations Related to Executive Compensation and Say-on-Pay Reporting

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On July 8, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) on executive compensation disclosure and reporting with respect to the frequency of shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (i.e., "say on pay").

Continue Reading...

PCAOB Proposes to Change Form and Content of Audit Reports

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On June 21, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) issued a Concept Release in which it proposed potential alternatives for changing the content of audit reports in order to "provide investors with more transparency into the audit process and more insight into the company's financial statements or other information outside the financial statements." The proposed alternatives (which are not mutually exclusive) include:

Continue Reading...

SEC Staff Publishes Observations from its Review of Interactive Data Financial Statements

Co-authored Jonathan D. Weiner

On June 15, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation published observations regarding filers' compliance with the SEC's rules concerning interactive data for financial reporting. The staff identified some of the most common and significant issues contained in interactive data submissions based on filings made in early 2011, which included 10-K's from Large Accelerated filers, the largest of which provided detailed tagging of notes to the financial statements. The staff also reiterated its view that the rendered version of interactive data (XBRL) financial statements need not look exactly the same as HTML financial statements, emphasizing the primacy of quality, completeness and accuracy of tagging over the formatting and appearance of XBRL financial statements.

Continue Reading...

PCAOB Chairman Considers Audit Firm Rotation

In a wide-ranging speech to the SEC and Financial Reporting Institute's 30th Annual Conference on June 2, James Doty, Chairman of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) raised for discussion and review the possibility that the PCAOB may require audit firm rotation.

Continue Reading...

SEC Proposes Rules for Disqualification of Felons and Other "Bad Actors" from Rule 506 Offerings

On May 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rule amendments that disqualify securities offerings involving certain "felons and other 'bad actors'" from reliance on the safe harbor from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D to reflect the requirements of Section 926 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 926 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that that the SEC issue disqualification rules for Rule 506 offerings that are "substantially similar" to the disqualification rules provided by Rule 262 of the Securities Act, which apply to securities offerings under Regulation A.

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues Final Rules for Whistleblower Program under Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by Kari E. Hoelting

On May 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued final rules creating a whistleblower program under Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as required by Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The new program authorizes the SEC to pay rewards to individuals who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information that leads to successful SEC enforcement actions that result in monetary sanctions totaling more than $1 million. The total amount of the award is between 10% and 30% of the monetary sanctions.

Continue Reading...

SEC Amends Dormant Filing Fee Account Procedures

On May 13, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended its procedures for holding funds in a filing fee account. Under current rules, after 180 days from the last filing fee deposit, withdrawal or other adjustment, funds in an SEC filing fee account are automatically returned to the account holder. The SEC has now amended rule 3a of its Informal and Other Procedures under the Securities Act of 1933 to extend this holding period to three years. After three years of inactivity the Commission will return funds to the account holder automatically, although the account holder may always request a refund of fees at any time. The SEC explained that extending the duration of the 180-day limitation would create greater efficiencies and less administrative burdens for both account holders and the SEC. It pointed out particularly that this amended account-clearing procedure will harmonize with Securities Act Rule 415(a)(5), which permits eligible issuers to conduct primary shelf offerings on an effective registration statement for a period of three years. The three-year account clearing procedure will allow such issuers, and in particular issuers permitted to file automatic shelf registration statements, to coordinate deposits of filing fees with the life of the registration statement. The SEC noted that any additional deposits or withdrawal requests during the three-year period will extend the time period for an additional three years.

Continue Reading...

SEC Schedules Open Meeting to Consider Whistleblower Incentive Rules and "Bad Boy" Disqualification Rules

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On May 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting to discuss whether to adopt rules and forms to implement the whistleblower provisions added to Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under rules proposed on November 3, 2010, the SEC will pay an award or awards to one or more whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information that leads to the successful enforcement by the SEC of a federal court or administrative action in which the SEC obtains monetary sanctions totaling more than $1 million. The proposed rules define certain terms critical to the operation of the whistleblower program, outline the procedures for applying for awards and the SEC's procedures for making decisions on claims, and generally explain the scope of the whistleblower program to the public and to potential whistleblowers. Of interest will be the SEC's response to critics who have argued that the SEC's proposed rules will thwart the effectiveness of corporate compliance programs.

Continue Reading...

SEC Chairman Shapiro Remarks on Capital-Raising Reform

In testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on May 10, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Shapiro stated that she had instructed the staff of the SEC to "take a fresh look" at rules relating to public and private offerings of securities in light of advances in technology, accelerated communications and changes in the operations of the financial markets, with a view to encouraging capital formation. No timetable was provided. Specific areas of focus outlined by Chairman Shapiro include:

  • the restrictions on communications in initial public offerings;
  • whether the ban on general solicitation or advertising for private placements should be revised;
  • the number of shareholders that trigger public reporting, including questions surrounding the use of special purpose vehicles that hold securities of a private company for groups of investors; and
  • regulatory questions posed by new capital-raising strategies.
Continue Reading...

SEC Extends Comment Period for Compensation Committee and Compensation Advisor Requirements

On March 30, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved proposed rules that would direct the national securities exchanges to establish listing standards that, among other things, require each member of an issuer's compensation committee to be a member of its board of directors, and to be "independent." In addition, the proposals would adopt new disclosure rules concerning the use of compensation consultants and conflicts of interest. See the April 1 edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest.

The SEC originally requested that comments be received by April 29. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in an April 15 letter, requested that the SEC extend the comment period and, after considering the request, the SEC extended the comment period to May 19.

Read more.

NASDAQ Proposes Tougher Listing Standards for Issuers Following Reverse Mergers

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On April 18, the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC filed a proposed rule change with the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt additional listing requirements for companies that have become public through transactions in which unlisted private operating companies merge into publicly traded shell companies, commonly known as reverse mergers. According to NASDAQ, proposed Rule 5110(c) was promulgated in response to widespread concerns of fraudulent behavior by, and unreliable financial statements of, reverse merger companies.

Proposed Rule 5110(c) would permit a company formed through such a reverse merger to submit an application for initial listing on a NASDAQ market only after that company has (1) traded for no less than six months in the over-the-counter market or on another national securities exchange or listed foreign market following the filing with the SEC or other regulatory authority of audited financial statements for the combined company, and (2) maintained a bid price of at least $4 per share on at least 30 of the 60 trading days immediately preceding the filing of the initial listing application.

The proposed rule also provides that a reverse merger company would only be approved for listing if, following the reverse merger transaction, it has timely filed (1) in the case of a domestic issuer, at least two periodic financial reports with the SEC or other regulatory authority, or (2) in the case of a foreign private issuer, one or more reports including financial statements for a period of not less than six months.

Proposed Rule 5110(c) would not apply to reverse merger companies applying for listing on NASDAQ in connection with a firm commitment underwritten public offering.

Read more.

SEC Issues Study and Recommendation on SOX Section 404(b) for Issuers with Public Float Between $75 and $250 Million

Section 989G(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act required the Securities and Exchange Commission to conduct a study to determine how the SEC could reduce the burden of complying with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the auditor attestation requirement) for companies whose market capitalization is between $75 and $250 million, while at the same time maintaining investor protection. The SEC was also required to consider whether an exemption for such companies from Section 404(b) compliance would encourage the U.S. listing of initial public offerings (IPOs).

In a 113-page study published on April 22, the SEC concluded that the existing requirements for issuers with a $75-$250 million public float to comply with the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) should be maintained and that no new exemptions should be granted. Specifically, the SEC found that over time the costs and burdens of Section 404(b) compliance have declined and that eliminating them would not "justify the loss of investor protections and benefits to issuers...". It also found that "the evidence does not suggest that granting an exemption to issuers that would expect to have $75-$250 million in public float following an IPO would, by itself, encourage companies in the United States or abroad to list their IPOs in the United States". In sum, the SEC, noting that the Dodd-Frank Act already exempts approximately 60% of reporting issuers from Section 404(b) compliance, does not recommend further extending this exemption.

Read more.

SEC Delays Planned Rulemaking Schedule to Implement Provisions of Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On April 8, the Securities and Exchange Commission updated its planned schedule for adopting rules and taking other actions to implement the corporate governance and disclosure provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. As reported in the September 24, 2010, edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, the SEC had previously announced its planned rulemaking schedule to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The updated schedule delays implementation of some of these provisions by as much as six months. Below are updated time periods set forth in the SEC's revised rulemaking schedule for governance and disclosure rules to be adopted during such time periods, as well as certain related actions. Section references are to the Dodd-Frank Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Proposes Rules Implementing Dodd-Frank Requirements Relating to Compensation Committees and Their Consultants and Advisers

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On March 30, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules directing the national securities exchanges to adopt listing standards related to the compensation committees of listed companies and their consultants and advisers, as required by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which added Section 10C to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As with all listing standards, the exchanges would need the approval of the SEC prior their adoption.

Continue Reading...

SEC Schedules Open Meeting to Consider Dodd-Frank Rules Relating to Compensation Committees and their Consultants and Advisors

On March 30, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting to discuss, among other matters, whether to adopt rules to implement Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 952 requires the SEC to direct the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit the listing of equity securities of issuers (with certain exceptions) whose compensation committees do not comply with the independence and other requirements set forth in Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act. These requirements include that each compensation committee member be an "independent" (as defined by the SEC) director and that such committees have authority to engage, and be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of, independent compensation consultants, legal counsel, or other advisors to a compensation committee. Section 952 lists various "independence" factors for the SEC to consider. Section 952 also requires that issuers provide appropriate funding for purposes of retaining such compensation consultants and advisors. Finally, Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act directs the SEC to provide appropriate procedures for an issuer to have reasonable opportunity to cure any defects with respect to the requirements outlined above, and provides that Section 952 does not apply to a "controlled company."

Read more.

Amendments to Dodd-Frank Act Introduced in House

Co-authored by Kari E. Hoelting

On March 16, members of the Capital Markets Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee introduced several bills designed to amend or supplement the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, including those described below:

Continue Reading...

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues Nine New C&DIs

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On March 4, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance issued Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) with respect to several topics under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Continue Reading...

SEC Schedules Open Meeting to Propose Rules on Financial Institution Incentive Compensation and Credit Ratings

On March 2, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting to discuss, among other matters, whether to propose rules to implement Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 956 requires that not later than nine months after enactment, the appropriate federal regulators jointly shall adopt regulations requiring "covered financial institutions" (as described below) with assets of $1 billion or greater to disclose incentive compensation to their appropriate federal regulator. Disclosure is required of all incentive-based compensation arrangements in sufficient detail for the regulator to determine if the arrangement with the executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder is excessive or could lead to a material financial loss. Within the same time frame, federal regulators are also required to jointly prescribe regulations to prohibit any type of incentive-based compensation by "covered financial institutions" with assets of $1 billion or greater that is excessive or could lead to material financial loss. Covered financial institutions include depository institutions, depository institution holding companies, credit unions, registered broker-dealers and registered investment advisers.

The SEC will also consider whether to propose rule amendments that would implement Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act relating to references to credit ratings in filings under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940. Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that the SEC: (1) review any regulation issued by it that requires the use of an assessment of the credit-worthiness of a security or money market instrument and any references to or requirements in its regulations regarding credit ratings, (2) modify any regulations to remove any reference to or requirement of reliance on credit ratings, and (3) substitute in its regulations a standard of credit-worthiness with alternative requirements.

See the February 11 edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest for a discussion of currently proposed rules under Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Read more.

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues Seven New C&DIs Regarding Say-On-Pay and Golden Parachute Compensation

Co-authored by Kari E. Hoelting

On February 11, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) with respect to Regulation S-K, Item 402(t) – Golden Parachute Compensation and Rule 14a-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 – Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation.

C&DI 128B.01 clarifies Instruction 1 to new S-K Item 402(t)(2) relating to golden parachute compensation disclosure. Although the instruction provides that disclosure is required for those executive officers included in the most recently filed Summary Compensation Table, disclosure is always required for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, even if disclosure was not provided for such individuals in the most recently filed Summary Compensation Table pursuant to Items 402(a)(3)(i) and (ii) because they assumed such positions after the Summary Compensation Table was filed.

Continue Reading...

SEC Proposes to Remove Form S-3 Credit Rating Qualification Conditions

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On February 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules amending the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to replace rule and form requirements for securities offerings and issuer disclosure rules that rely on, or make special accommodations for, credit ratings to reflect the requirements of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that the SEC (1) review any regulation issued by it that requires the use of an assessment of the credit-worthiness of a security or money market instrument and any references to or requirements in its regulations regarding credit ratings, (2) modify any regulations to remove any reference to or requirement of reliance on credit ratings, and (3) substitute in its regulations a standard of credit-worthiness with alternative requirements. The proposed rules are similar to rules proposed in 2008, which were not adopted by the SEC.

Continue Reading...

SEC Extends Comment Period for Proposed Rules Regarding Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On January 28, the Securities and Exchange Commission extended the comment period for proposed rules to implement Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act regarding "conflict minerals" disclosure from January 31 to March 2. As reported in the December 17, 2010, edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, the SEC issued proposed rules implementing disclosure and reporting requirements regarding the use by issuers of so-called conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries. The proposed rules are expected to apply to many more issuers than might have first been expected due to the various uses of conflict minerals and their derivatives and the broad scope of the SEC's proposed rule encompassing such minerals as are "necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured" by a reporting company. Assuming the SEC adopts final rules in April 2011, as required by Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Act, a December 31 fiscal year-end issuer would first have to provide conflict minerals disclosure or a Conflict Minerals Report after the end of its December 31, 2012, fiscal year. In its release extending the comment period the SEC acknowledged that the nature of the proposed disclosure requirements "differs from the disclosures traditionally required by the Exchange Act"; they would require extensive due diligence efforts by public companies.

Read more.

SEC Proposes Rules to Amend Net Worth Standard for Accredited Investor Definition

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On January 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rules amending the accredited investor standards under the Securities Act of 1933 to reflect the requirements of Section 413(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The proposed rules would amend Rules 215 and Rule 501(a)(5) of the Securities Act to exclude the value of a person's primary residence from the $1 million net worth (or joint net worth) test for determining whether a person is an "accredited investor" under Regulation D. The proposed rules would also amend Rules 215 and Rule 501(a)(5) to clarify that net worth is calculated by excluding only the investor's net equity in its primary residence by adding the phrase "calculated by subtracting from the estimated fair market value of the property the amount of debt secured by the property, up to the estimated fair market value of the property." While this clarification (as well as the technical and conforming amendments referenced below) supplements Section 413(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the exclusion itself was effective upon enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Adopts Final Say-on-Pay Rules

On January 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted, by a 3-2 vote, final rules under Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which was enacted by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 14A requires public companies to conduct separate non-binding shareholder advisory votes to approve the named executive officer (NEO) compensation (say-on-pay) and the frequency of the say-on-pay vote (say-on-when). Section 14A also requires expanded, tabular format disclosure of NEO compensation arrangements in connection with mergers or similar transactions (golden parachutes) and a related separate advisory vote on golden parachutes in merger proxy statements. Although the final rules are not effective until 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, the say-on-pay and say-on-when requirements are effective for annual or special shareholder meetings occurring on or after January 21, 2011, under the Dodd-Frank Act provisions. The final rules provide transition guidance pending the effectiveness of the rules. The rules on golden parachute disclosure and the separate advisory vote are effective April 25.

Continue Reading...

SEC Schedules Open Meeting to Discuss Say-on-Pay Proposed Rules and Changes to Accredited Investor Definition

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On January 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting to discuss, among other matters, whether to adopt rules to implement Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (adding Section 14A to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), which requires shareholder advisory votes (1) to approve the compensation of executives, a so-called “say-on-pay” vote and (2) as to the frequency of shareholder say-on-pay votes. Also required are expanded, tabular format disclosure of executive compensation in connection with mergers or similar transactions (golden parachutes) and a related separate advisory vote on golden parachutes in merger proxy statements. These requirements are effective for annual or special shareholder meetings occurring on or after January 21. The SEC had proposed rules under Section 14A on October 18, 2010.

The SEC will also consider whether to propose rule amendments that would implement Section 413(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act regarding the definition of “accredited investor” for private placement purposes. Section 413(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act excludes the value of a person’s primary residence from the calculation of net worth when determining an “accredited investor” under Rules 215 and 501(a)(5) of the Securities Act of 1933. On July 23, 2010, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (C&DI) 179.01 (as well as C&DI 255.47, which is identical), which confirmed that the exclusion was effective upon enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act and that the SEC would amend its rules to conform them to the adjusted net worth standard in the Dodd-Frank Act.

Read more.

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues 10 New C&DIs Regarding Change in Accountants

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On January 14, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) with respect to Regulation S-K, Item 304 – Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure; and Form 8-K, Item 4.01 – Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.

Continue Reading...

Mixed Signals on "Say-on-Frequency" Vote

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, public companies holding their annual meetings on or after January 21 will be required to include in their proxy statements a non-binding proposal soliciting shareholders’ views on whether “say-on-pay” proposals should be submitted to shareholders on an annual, biennial or triennial basis. Proxy cards for such annual meeting will be required to provide shareholders with these three choices plus the ability to abstain.

Many companies have yet to decide whether to recommend one of these choices to shareholders and, if so, which choice to recommend. There have been conflicting reports with respect to the favored choice of public companies. On the one hand, Compensia News published a listing of 87 companies that filed proxy materials through January 8 containing “say-on-frequency” proposals, with a majority (45) favoring triennial “say-on-pay” votes. Twenty-five companies recommended annual votes, nine recommended biennial votes, and eight companies provided no recommendation. The listing of companies in each category does not provide any clear trend as between larger and smaller companies.

On the other hand, a Towers Watson poll of 135 publicly traded companies that had not yet filed proxy statements found that a majority of those surveyed expected to recommend annual “say-on-pay” votes. The Towers Watson survey also notes that most surveyed companies do not know the level of favorable shareholder vote that would be considered a “success” or otherwise indicative of preference. This is understandable, considering that shareholders will be required to be given four choices, that no one choice may actually receive a majority of the votes cast, and that in any event the vote is non-binding.

Click here to read the Compensia News report.
Click here to read the results of the Towers Watson poll.

SEC Increases Fees in 2011

Co-authored by Blase J. Kornacki

On December 22, President Obama signed H.R. 3082, the continuing resolution that will fund federal agencies until approximately February. The resolution has triggered increases in fees collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Effective December 27, 2010, the fee rate applicable to registration of securities, registered repurchases of securities by issuers or their affiliates and proxy solicitations and statements in corporate control transactions has increased from $71.30 per $1 million to a new rate of $116.10 per $1 million. The fee change will also affect the fees payable with the Annual Notice of Securities Sold Pursuant to Rule 24f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which are based on the rate applicable to the registration of securities. Furthermore, effective January 21, the fee rate applicable to securities transactions on exchanges and over-the-counter markets will increase from $16.90 per $1 million in transactions to a new rate of $19.20 per $1 million.

Click here to read the SEC’s Fee Rate Advisory #5 for Fiscal Year 2011.

ISS Publishes FAQs for Policies on Proxy Voting Recommendations

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On December 14 and January 4, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published FAQs regarding its policies for determining proxy voting recommendations for meetings to be held on or after February 1. As described in the December 3, 2010, edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, ISS previously published its updated recommendation policies for the 2011 proxy season. The FAQs addressed ISS policies related to, among other things, executive compensation, director elections and other corporate governance matters, including the following:

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues Proposed Rules Regarding Conflict Minerals Disclosure

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On December 15, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules implementing disclosure and reporting requirements regarding the use by issuers of conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries (DRC countries) added as Section 13(p) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 1502(e)(4) of the Dodd-Frank Act defines “conflict mineral” as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, or any other minerals or their derivatives determined by the Secretary of State to be financing conflict in the DRC countries. The proposed rules are expected to apply to many more issuers than might have first been expected due to the various uses of conflict minerals and their derivatives and the SEC’s broad definition of “manufacture.”

Continue Reading...

ISS Publishes Updated Policies for Proxy Voting Recommendations

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On November 19, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) published updated policies for determining its proxy voting recommendations for meetings to be held on or after February 1, 2011. ISS’s policy updates for 2011 include the following:

Continue Reading...

SOX 404: A Sixth-Year Evaluation

Co-authored by Blase J. Kornacki

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX 404) mandates that public companies assess their internal controls over financial reporting (ICFRs). SOX 404(a) requires company management to assess ICFRs, and SOX 404(b) calls for registered public accounting firms to attest to and report on the assessments, made by management.

Implementation of SOX 404 began with U.S. accelerated filers who were first required to provide management assessment and auditor attestation in annual reports for periods ending on or after November 15, 2004. Since 2004, all filers, other than non-accelerated filers (who now have been permanently exempted from the requirements of SOX 404(b) by the recently passed Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act), have phased into the SOX 404 regulatory scheme and are currently required to provide SOX 404(a) and (b) certifications in their annual reports.

In the six years since the initial implementation date of SOX 404, Audit Analytics has compiled annual reports and published data on the required auditor attestations and management assessments. The SOX 404 Dashboard - Year Six Update, published in October, reports that in year six of SOX 404, only 2.4% of filings contained adverse auditor attestation disclosures. This represents a more than 50% drop since year five, in which the adverse disclosure rate came in at 5%, and an even more significant drop since year one, in which the adverse disclosure rate was 16.9%. The study shows a steady decline in adverse auditor attestations throughout the six years of SOX 404’s existence and suggests that auditor involvement in the evaluation process may have led to the improvement of companies’ ICFRs. However, the study also shows that adverse disclosure rate for management-only assessments continues to be high—27.8% in 2010. Nonetheless, the year six figure reflects a drop from 32.3% in year five, 32.0% in year four, and 32.8% in year three. The study suggests that the high percentage of adverse management assessments indicates that non-accelerated filers fail to maintain ICFRs that are as reliable as ICFRs maintained by accelerated filers.

SEC Issues Proposed Rules for Whistleblower Program under Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On November 3, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules for implementing the whistleblower provisions added to Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Under the proposed rules, the SEC will pay an award or awards to one or more whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information that leads to the successful enforcement by the SEC of a federal court or administrative action in which the SEC obtains monetary sanctions totaling more than $1 million.

Continue Reading...

SEC Letter to Public Company CFOs Regarding Mortgage and Foreclosure-Related Activities or Exposures

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

The Securities and Exchange Commission has released a letter sent in late October by its Division of Corporation Finance to the chief financial officers of certain public companies to remind them of disclosure obligations in their upcoming Form 10-Qs and subsequent filings in light of continued concerns about potential risks and costs associated with mortgage- and foreclosure-related activities or exposures. The letter instructs companies to review their various mortgage-related representations and warranties made in sale agreements with purchasers of the mortgages or mortgage-backed securities and consider the implications on their accounting and disclosures. In addition, companies undertaking reviews of their loan documentation and foreclosure practices and which have suspended foreclosures pending completion of such reviews should consider their treatment of loss contingencies and disclosures.

Item 103 (Legal Proceedings) and Item 303 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) of Regulation S-K, as well as accounting rules regarding contingencies set forth in Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 450-20 (SFAS 5), require public companies to provide clear and transparent disclosure regarding their obligations relating to representations and warranties made in connection with securitization activities and whole loan sales, including a roll forward of related reserves. In addition, companies are encouraged to discuss implications of any foreclosure review, including potential delays in completing foreclosures, if applicable. These disclosures may include increased risks and uncertainties, including litigation risks, potential defects in securitizations, impairments and liquidity, and should address the company’s role as an originator, securitizer, servicer or investor, as applicable. The letter notes that some of these disclosure issues are not limited to financial institutions that sold or securitized mortgages or mortgage-backed securities, and instructs companies that engage in mortgage servicing, title insurance, mortgage insurance and other activities relating to residential mortgages to consider the impact of these and similar issues for their disclosures.

Click here for a copy of the SEC letter.

SEC Publishes Staff Review of Public Company Interactive Data Financial Statements

On November 1, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Risk, Strategy and Financial Innovation released a report of its review of the Interactive Data Financial Statement submissions during June–August. The submissions reviewed included the first group of mandated detailed tagged public company filings and the initial filings of the second phase-in group of public companies. The staff expects these deficiencies to be addressed by filers in their November Form 10-Q filings and future filings.

The most common deficiencies identified in the review included incorrect tagging of data with negative values, unnecessary use of custom elements where existing U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles taxonomy is appropriate, incorrect tagging of classes of stock, and improper designations by consolidated entities of parent company and subsidiary information, and incorrect tagging of parenthetical line item data.

Click here to read the staff report.

SEC to Propose Whistleblower Incentive Rules

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act added Section 21F to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 21F mandates that the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to regulations prescribed by the SEC, pay awards to eligible whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the Commission with “original information” about a violation of federal securities laws that leads to the successful enforcement of a “covered judicial or administrative action.” The Dodd-Frank Act mandated awards range between 10% and 30% of monetary sanctions imposed, where such sanctions exceed $1 million. The SEC intends to propose whistleblower rules at its open meeting next Wednesday, November 3.

At a recent conference organized by the National Association of Corporate Directors, SEC Chairman Mary Shapiro, responding to concerns voiced that the Dodd-Frank whistleblower program would give employees at public companies very strong incentives to bypass corporate whistleblower programs and report alleged violations directly to the SEC, stated, “It is not our desire in any way, shape, or form to undermine the processes that great public companies have built in to ensure that they handle whistleblowers appropriately. We don’t want to undermine what we view as a critically important component of regulation, and that is the corporate effort to ensure that whistleblowers are heard and their information is acted upon reasonably, and problems are fixed early on.” Whatever rules are proposed by the SEC, they will need to address the balance between preserving corporate whistleblower programs and implementing the Dodd-Frank mandate.

Read more.

FINRA Revises Policy on Free Writing Prospectuses

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority recently issued Regulatory Notice 10-52, which states that any free-writing prospectus (FWP) distributed by a broker-dealer in a manner reasonably designed to lead to a “broad unrestricted dissemination” as described in Rule 433(d)(1)(ii) of the Securities Act of 1933, is subject to the provisions of NASD Rules 2210 and 2211. FINRA’s prior interpretation in 2006 had excluded such FWPs from the provisions of NASD Rules 2210 and 2211.

NASD Rules 2210 and 2211 establish standards for the content of communications with the public by broker-dealers and include principal review and filing requirements with FINRA. NASD Rule 2210(b)(1) requires a registered principal of the broker-dealer to review and approve each advertisement and item of sales literature before it is distributed. NASD Rule 2210(c)(2) requires that firms file advertisements and sales literature regarding securities of certain entities, such as registered investment companies and public direct participation programs, with FINRA within 10 business days of first use.

FINRA states that it is following guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission as to the scope of the term “broad unrestricted dissemination.” The SEC has noted that examples of broad unrestricted dissemination of an FWP by a broker-dealer would include posting an FWP on an unrestricted website or releasing it to the media. A posting of an FWP to a restricted website or an FWP sent directly to the broker-dealer’s customers, regardless of the number of customers, does not constitute a broad unrestricted dissemination.

FINRA notes that if an FWP is distributed by a broker-dealer in a manner that is not reasonably designed to lead to its broad unrestricted dissemination, the exemptions from the provisions of NASD Rules 2210 and 2211 will continue to apply.

Read more.

FASB Delays Proposed Litigation Contingency Financial Statement Disclosure

On October 27, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) announced that it was delaying the effective date of its July 2010 exposure draft, Contingencies (Topic 450): Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies. The exposure draft had proposed that public entities would begin providing enhanced loss contingency disclosures in financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010. The FASB will announce an effective date after its redeliberations based on the comments that it received.

Click here to read the FASB announcement and here to read the Exposure Draft.

SEC Proposes Rules for Say-on-Pay and Investment Manager Proxy Vote Reporting

On October 18, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed new rules under Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which was enacted by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 14A requires public companies to conduct separate non-binding shareholder advisory votes to approve the named executive officer (NEO) compensation (say-on-pay) and the frequency of the say-on-pay vote (say-on-when). Section 14A also requires expanded, tabular format disclosure of executive compensation in connection with mergers or similar transactions (golden parachutes) and a related separate advisory vote on golden parachutes in merger proxy statements. These requirements are effective for annual or special shareholder meetings occurring on or after January 21, 2011.

Inclusion of the say-on-pay or say-on-when proposal does not require the filing of a preliminary proxy statement. The proposed rules also require disclosure in Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) whether, and if so, how companies have considered the results of previous say-on-pay votes. The proposed rules require that shareholders shall be given a separate say-on-when vote to determine the frequency of the say-on-pay vote, i.e., whether it shall be as often as every year, every other year or once every three years. The separate say-on-when vote must occur at least once every six years. Because companies that have received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds are required to have annual say-on-pay votes, these companies are exempt from the requirement to include a say-on-when proposal until the company is no longer subject to the TARP restrictions. While the proposed rules require smaller reporting companies to include a say-on-pay vote, smaller reporting companies can continue to follow the scaled compensation disclosure requirements and are not required to include CD&A.

The proposed rules also require institutional investment managers who are required to file Form 13F (generally those who manage publicly traded equity securities having an aggregate fair market value of at least $100 million) to file Form N-PX, Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record, by August 31 of each year to report the manager’s votes relating to the say-on-pay, say-on-when and golden parachute matters described above. Form N-PX, which is currently required to be filed by registered management investment companies, is being amended for use by institutional investment managers as well.

The comment period for the proposed rules closes on November 18.

Click here and here to read the text of the proposed rules.

SEC Stays Implementation of Shareholder Proxy Access Rules

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On September 29, the Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenging the validity of new Rule 14a-11, the so-called proxy access rule. On the same date, the Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a petition with the Securities and Exchange Commission seeking to stay the implementation of Rule 14a-11 pending resolution of the matter by the Court of Appeals. This rule was adopted in August by the SEC along with an Amendment to Rule 14a-8, and was to become effective on November 15. See the August 27 edition of Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest for a summary of Rules 14a-11 and 14a-8 (i)(8).

On October 4, the SEC granted the requested stay in the implementation of Rule 14a-11. It also stayed the effectiveness of Amended Rule 14a-8, even though not part of the petitioner’s petition, on the basis that it was “intertwined” with Rule 14a-11, and cited a potential for confusion if the amendment to Rule 14a-8 were to become effective while Rule 14a-11 is stayed. While the parties have agreed to seek expedited review, the SEC’s stay of the two rules will remain in effect pending resolution of the matter by the Court of Appeals.

Most legal analysts, as well as a spokesman for the SEC, believe that the matter will not be resolved until some time in the spring of 2011, with the practical result that these rules will not be in effect for most public companies (including those with fiscal years ending December 31) until the 2012 proxy season.

Click here for Business Roundtable’s petition to the Court of Appeals.
Click here for Business Roundtable’s petition to the SEC for a stay.
Click here for the SEC’s order granting stay.

SEC Publishes Final Rule Removing Rating Agency Exemption from Regulation FD

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On September 29, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted an amendment, effective upon publication in the Federal Register, to remove the specific exemption from Regulation FD for issuer disclosures made to nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and credit rating agencies, as required by Section 939B of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Under Rule 100(b)(2)(iii) of Regulation FD as in effect prior to the SEC’s final rule, the issuer or person acting on its behalf need not publicly disclose the material nonpublic information if the disclosure of such information is made to a credit rating agency that makes its credit ratings publicly available, or is made pursuant to Rule 17g-5(a)(3) to a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

Regulation FD was adopted to address the problem of selective disclosure made to those who would reasonably be expected to trade securities on the basis of the information or provide others with advice about securities trading, by requiring that when an issuer, or any person acting on its behalf, discloses material nonpublic information to certain enumerated persons (including brokers, dealers, investment advisers, institutional investment managers, investment companies and certain persons associated with the foregoing and holders of the issuer’s securities), the information must also be publicly disclosed.

Following the removal of the Regulation FD exemption for rating agencies, if a rating agency is determined to be one of the enumerated persons covered by Regulation FD, or if a rating agency is deemed to be acting on behalf of the issuer and the rating agency discloses material nonpublic information to one of the enumerated persons covered by Regulation FD, then the obligations of Regulation FD could apply to information disclosed by the issuer to the rating agency, unless the rating agency expressly agrees to maintain the disclosed information in confidence as set forth in Rule 100(b)(2)(ii) of Regulation FD.

Click here for the complete text of the SEC’s adopting release.

SEC Outlines Planned Rulemaking Schedule to Implement Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

The Securities and Exchange Commission has announced its planned schedule for proposing and adopting rules and taking other action to implement the corporate governance and disclosure provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Certain of the Dodd-Frank Act provisions apply to proxy materials and proxy voting records that are prepared in connection with annual meetings of shareholders that occur after six months following enactment (January 20, 2011). For these provisions, the SEC intends to propose and adopt final rules prior to such date. Other corporate governance provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are not effective until the SEC adopts rules; of these, some include dates by which the SEC must act, while others are silent. The SEC considers matters with specified dates indicative of congressional priorities and will propose and adopt rules with respect to these areas first. The SEC expects to adopt all rules with dates specified in the Dodd-Frank Act by one year following enactment (July 21, 2011). Below are the time periods set forth in the SEC’s planned rulemaking schedule and the rules to be proposed or adopted during such time periods, as well as certain related actions. Section references are to the Dodd-Frank Act.

Continue Reading...

SEC Publishes Final Rule for Dodd-Frank Permanent Exemption of Non-Accelerated Filers from SOX 404(b) Auditor Attestation Reports

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On September 15, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted amendments to its rules and forms to conform them to new Section 404(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as added by Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 404(c) provides that the auditor attestation report on internal controls over financial reporting required in annual reports under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act shall not apply with respect to any audit report of an issuer that is neither an accelerated filer nor a large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Prior to enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, a non-accelerated filer (a company with a public equity float under $75 million) would have been required under Item 308 of Regulation S-K to include an auditor attestation report in the filer’s annual report filed with the SEC for fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010.

Click here for the complete text of the SEC’s adopting release.

SEC Addresses Disclosure of Short-Term Borrowing

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

At a September 17 open meeting, the Securities and Exchange Commission, by a unanimous vote, approved the publication for comment of proposed rules that would require enhanced disclosure of short-term borrowings by registrants. The SEC also approved the publication of guidance regarding enhanced disclosure of short-term borrowing under existing rules requiring disclosure of an issuer’s liquidity and capital resources.

The proposed rules would require the issuer’s Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) to include quantitative and qualitative disclosure regarding short-term borrowing during the period reported. Current rules require issuers to disclose short-term borrowing as of the end of the period reported. The proposed rules would require issuers to disclose, among other things, the average and maximum amount of short-term borrowing during the period reported as well as the weighted average interest rates for all classes of short-term borrowing. So-called “Financial Companies” (as such term will be defined in the proposed rules) will be required to provide such averages and maximum borrowings on a daily basis, while other issuers will be required to provide such information on a monthly basis.

The SEC also approved interpretive guidance intended to remind issuers that current rules regarding disclosure of liquidity and capital resources as part of MD&A do not permit the use of financial structures to mask an issuer’s financial condition. In that regard, the guidance will clarify that financial ratios presented in periodic reports may not be presented in a way that obscures an issuer’s financial condition. Lastly, the guidance will address the presentation of information in an issuer’s table of contractual obligations.

According to the SEC, the new rules are primarily intended to address concerns that a “snapshot” of an issuer’s financial condition as of the end of a period may not shed light on an issuer’s need for short-term borrowing or fully inform investors of the risks or capital requirements for the company.

The text of the proposed rules and interpretive guidance was not available at press time, but a press release is expected to be posted to the SEC’s website.
 

SEC Adopts Shareholder Access Rules

Co-authored by Robert J. Wild

On August 25, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules, effective 60 days following publication in the Federal Register, permitting shareholders or groups of shareholders to access the proxy statements of public companies for the purpose of nominating directors.

Under new Rule 14a-11, the holder or holders of 3% or more of the shares of the company entitled to vote on the election of directors, who continuously owned such shares for at least three years, will be permitted to nominate, and have included in the company’s proxy statement, the greater of one nominee or nominees representing 25% of the company’s board of directors.

The Rule requires that the nominating shareholder(s) file with the company and the SEC a new Schedule 14N in which the nominating shareholder(s) must make several representations and disclosures regarding its background and intentions and provide detailed information with respect to its nominees. There also are provisions permitting the company to challenge the qualifications under the Rule of either the nominating shareholder(s) or its nominees.

In addition, the SEC has amended Rule 14a-8(i)(8) to require companies to include in company proxy materials shareholder proposals that would amend, or request an amendment of, the company’s governing documents regarding nominating procedures related to shareholder nominations, provided that those proposals may not conflict with new Rule 14a-11. Permitted amendments would be those that, for example, seek to reduce the minimum ownership or holding requirements provided under Rule 14a-11 or otherwise lessen its requirements for nominating shareholders.

Smaller reporting companies (filers which have a pubic equity float of $75 million or less) are not subject to Rule 14a-11 until three years following its effective date.

Click here to read a Katten Client Advisory providing a more detailed analysis of the new rules.
Click here to access the SEC’s final Rule.

SEC to Consider Proxy Access Rules Next Week

On August 18, the Securities and Exchange Commission provided notice that at an open meeting on August 25, the Commission will consider whether to adopt changes to the federal proxy and other rules to facilitate director nominations by shareholders.

In June 2009, the SEC proposed proxy access rules, but delayed adopting them pending confirmation, in the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, of its power to implement such rules. Speculation with respect to the new rules centers primarily around the percentage and duration of ownership necessary to require the company to include the stockholder’s nominees in the company’s proxy statement and whether there will be some relief for smaller public companies.

The SEC’s Sunshine Act Notice can be accessed here.
The SEC’s 2009 Proxy Access proposal can be accessed here.

New York State Adopts Amendments to Power of Attorney Law

Co-authored by Blase J. Kornacki

In 2009, New York State adopted amendments to the New York Power of Attorney Law imposing more demanding power of attorney disclosure and execution requirements aimed at reducing the risks of abuse and fraud in elderly care and the financial planning process. The 2009 law required the use of longer, more comprehensive forms, as well as notarization of the signatures on the power of attorney. The 2009 law provided no exceptions for commercial transactions. Because agency relationships are regularly established in the proxy process, real estate transactions, brokerage arrangements and various commercial agreements, the lack of commercial transaction exception in the 2009 law gave rise to much uncertainty among transactional lawyers. On August 13, New York enacted corrective amendments revising the ambiguities and correcting the unintended consequences of the 2009 law.

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues New Interpretations on Form S-3 Eligibility, Incorporation of Proxy Statements in Annual Reports and Foreign Private Issuer Status

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

On August 11, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) on topics including the availability of Form S-3 for issuers filing shelf registration statements in reliance on General Instruction I.B.6 (limited primary offerings) of that form, the incorporation of information required by Part III of Form 10-K from proxy statements and foreign private issuer status.

Continue Reading...

SEC Issues a New "Accredited Investor" CDI

Co-authored by Palash Pandya

On July 23, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance issued a new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (CDI) in connection with the change to the definition of "accredited investor" under Rules 215 and 501 of the Securities Act of 1933 mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act). As reported in the July 23 edition of the Corporate and Financial Weekly Digest, Section 413 of the Act excludes the value of a person’s primary residence from the calculation of net worth when determining an "accredited investor" under Rules 215 and 501(a)(5). CDI 179.01 (as well as CDI 255.47 which is identical), while confirming that the exclusion was effective upon enactment of the Act, also states that the SEC will issue amendments to its rules to conform them to the adjusted net worth standard in the Act. CDI 179.01 also states that while the value of the person's primary residence must be excluded when determining net worth for purposes of Rules 215 and 501(a)(5), pending implementation of the changes to the SEC rules, the related amount of indebtedness secured by the primary residence up to its fair market value may also be excluded when determining net worth for purposes of such Rules. However, indebtedness secured by the residence in excess of the value of the home should be considered a liability and deducted when determining net worth for purposes of Rules 215 and 501(a)(5).

In addition, the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance withdrew CDI 255.13, which provided that an investor may include the estimated fair market value of his principal residence as an asset for purposes of Rule 501(a)(5). The withdrawal was necessary to be consistent with Section 413(a) of the Act.

CDI 179.01 can be found here.

Katten's July 23 edition of the Corporate and Weekly Financial Digest can be found here.
 

SEC Solicits Public Comment in Connection with Regulatory Initiatives Under the Dodd-Frank Reform Bill

Co-authored by Jonathan Weiner

On July 27, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro announced that the SEC is soliciting public comments in connection with regulatory initiatives required to be undertaken by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act). The SEC is generally required by law to establish a public comment period at the time it proposes rules or rule amendments. However, because of the volume of new regulations required by the Act and the time constraints imposed, the public will have the opportunity to express its views (and will have access to others’ views) on various topics requiring regulatory rulemaking and study under the Act even before the SEC proposes rules or amendments. To facilitate this process, the SEC has established a web-based platform for members of the public to submit and review comments on each of the various topics that will be subject to SEC rulemaking and study.

Continue Reading...

Dodd-Frank Reform Bill May Put a Damper on Private Placements

Two little-noted provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), enacted on July 21, have the potential to make less attractive a "safe harbor" exemption for private placements of securities currently available under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the '33 Act).

Rule 506 of Regulation D, promulgated under the '33 Act, has provided, subject to other provisions of Regulation D, a "safe harbor" for the sale of securities to an unlimited number of "accredited investors" as well as to no more than 35 sophisticated investors who are not "accredited investors." The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the narrowing of the definition of "accredited investor" and adds "bad boy" provisions to Rule 506 of Regulation D.

Continue Reading...

Wall Street Reform Act Contains Significant Governance and Disclosure Provisions

Yesterday, the Senate approved the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act with no changes to the governance provisions of the Conference Committee version of the bill. President Obama is expected to sign it in the near future. The bill includes significant changes to corporate governance and executive compensation and disclosure applicable to publicly traded issuers. Provisions address say on pay, proxy access, compensation clawbacks, compensation committee independence and further restrictions on broker discretionary voting.

Click here to read the Katten Client Advisory providing a more detailed discussion of these Dodd-Frank provisions.
Click here to read the bill.

Speech by SEC Chairman on Corporate Governance and Disclosure Initiatives

On July 9, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro spoke at the National Conference of the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals in Chicago about upcoming SEC governance and disclosure rulemaking.

In particular, following enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC will be focusing on drafting implementing rules and initiating studies as directed by the Act. The staff will also be reevaluating all of the corporate issuer filing forms and disclosure requirements to confirm the current relevancy and comprehensiveness of the information. The SEC expects to act quickly as to recommendations for revision of the risk disclosure requirements and to consider more comprehensive changes such as changing filing formats so that basic information can be more easily updated by companies and used by investors.

Chairman Schapiro noted that the “SEC’s job is not to define for the market what constitutes ‘good’ or ‘bad’ governance, in a one-size-fits-all approach. Rather, the SEC’s job is to ensure that its rules support effective communication and accountability” among shareholders, directors and executives.

Read more.

SEC Publishes Concept Release on "Proxy Plumbing"

Co-authored by Blase J. Kornacki

On July 14, the Securities and Exchange Commission unanimously approved the long-awaited concept release on mechanics of proxy distribution and collection. The release marks the Commission’s first public review of the proxy voting system in nearly 30 years. Highlighting that the proxy process is the principal means of communication between companies and investors, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro stressed that the “transmission of this communication must be—and must be perceived to be—timely, accurate, unbiased, and fair.” The SEC hopes that the release will help guide the agency’s revisions of proxy mechanics and ensure that all market participants are afforded adequate proxy access.

The release solicits public comment on a number of key issues in three main areas: (1) accuracy, transparency and efficiency of the proxy voting process, (2) communication and shareholder participation, and (3) the relationship between voting power and economic interest. Within this framework, the release comprehensively analyzes a number of specific topics including:

Continue Reading...

SEC to Consider Concept Release on Proxy Mechanics

Co-authored by Frank Zarb

The Securities and Exchange Commission has announced that it will hold an open meeting on July 14 to consider issuance of its long-anticipated concept release on proxy mechanics. The concept release is expected to cover a wide variety of topics relating to shareholder communication and proxy voting. The topics may include whether investors should continue to have the right to maintain the confidentiality of their investments (the “NOBO/OBO” mechanism), ways to increase retail shareholder voting (e.g., “client directed voting”), the structure of the overall system for distribution of proxy materials, including the fees paid by issuers, and whether the SEC should adopt additional regulations governing the activities of proxy advisors retained by institutional investors. We anticipate a 90-day comment period, and encourage all interested parties to weigh in on these important topics.

Read more.

House Approves Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Bill

Earlier this week, the House of Representatives approved the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Senate vote has been delayed until mid-July with signing by President Obama expected thereafter. The bill includes significant changes to corporate governance and executive compensation and disclosure applicable to publicly traded issuers. Provisions address say on pay, proxy access, compensation clawbacks, compensation committee independence and further restrictions on broker discretionary voting. Of note is that the majority voting requirement that would have required directors in uncontested elections to be approved by a majority of the votes cast was dropped from the Senate version of the bill.

An upcoming Katten Client Advisory will provide a more detailed discussion of the Dodd-Frank provisions.

Senate Bill Proposes SEC Whistleblower Law

Co-authored by Steven G. Eckhaus and Evan A. Belosa

Among the myriad provisions of the pending financial reform bill is the creation of a viable whistleblower system under which informants who report securities laws violations to the Securities and Exchange Commission will be provided with monetary rewards. The plan is based in part on the success of the Internal Revenue Service’s similar whistleblower program.

Under proposed Section 922 of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (the Senate Bill), the SEC will be required to pay a reward to individuals who provide “original information” to the SEC that results in monetary sanctions to the violating party exceeding $1 million. The award can range from 10% to 30% of the amount that is recouped, with the actual amount of the award at the discretion of the SEC. Section 922 prohibits the SEC from providing an award to a whistleblower who is convicted of a criminal violation related to the judicial or administrative action for which the whistleblower provided information; who gains the information from a government investigation, report or audit; who fails to submit information to the SEC as required by an SEC rule; or who is an employee of the U.S. Department of Justice or a regulatory agency, a self-regulatory organization, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or a law enforcement organization.

The Senate Bill would explicitly provide for whistleblower retaliation protection, so as to prevent employers from firing or otherwise discriminating against those taking advantage of this law. Section 922 creates a prohibition against retaliation and a private right of action for employees who have suffered retaliation.

Section 922 of the Senate Bill closely resembles Section 7203 of the House of Representatives’ earlier Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, H.R. 4173 (the House Bill). The key difference, however, is that the Senate Bill provides for a 10% floor on whistleblowing awards, while the House Bill provides for no floor.

Reconciliation of the House and Senate Bills is underway, with debate on these sections scheduled for next week.

The Senate Bill can be accessed here.
HR 4173 can be accessed here.

SEC Issues New Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations

Co-authored by David S. Kravitz

On June 4, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance added new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) and revised or withdrew others.

Included in the SEC’s new C&DIs is the following guidance:

  • The new Item 5.07 of Form 8-K requirement to report the number of shareholder votes cast for, against or withheld applies to any matter submitted to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
  • Although Rule 415(a)(4) permits an issuer to register an “at-the-market” offering of equity securities without identifying an underwriter in its registration statement, the SEC has not changed its interpretation that market makers, specialists or ordinary broker-dealers that purchase registered equity securities as principal from an issuer or sell such equity securities for the issuer as an agent will ordinarily be deemed a statutory underwriter within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), even in the absence of any written agreement with the issuer.
Continue Reading...

SEC Chairman Issues Statement on GAAP-IFRS Convergence Project

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On June 2, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) announced modifications to their timetable for, and prioritization of, standards being developed by these boards in connection with improving U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and achieving convergence of GAAP and IFRS. According to the joint statement issued by the FASB and IASB, these boards had previously set June 2011 as the target date for completing all major convergence projects. During the past few months, stakeholders voiced concerns about their ability to provide input on the large number of exposure drafts of standards planned for publication in the second quarter of this year. In response, the FASB and IASB are developing a modified strategy to take account of these concerns that would prioritize certain major projects and stagger publication of exposure drafts, resulting in the extension of the target completion dates for some convergence projects to the second half of 2011.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Chairman, Mary Schapiro, issued a statement on June 2 in which she indicated that the modification by the FASB and IASB to the timing for completion of certain convergence projects should not impact the SEC staff’s analyses under the Work Plan issued by the SEC in February 2010, the results of which will aid the SEC in its evaluation of the impact that the use of IFRS by U.S. issuers would have on the U.S. securities market. Chairman Schapiro also stated that the SEC remains on schedule for its determination in 2011 of whether and how to incorporate IFRS into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers.

Click here for the full text of the joint statement issued by the FASB and IASB.
Click here for the full text of Chairman Schapiro’s statement.

SEC Proposes Amendments to NASDAQ Listing Rules

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On May 19, the Securities and Exchange Commission published a notice soliciting comments on amendments to NASDAQ’s Listing Rules. NASDAQ filed the rule change with the SEC on May 14 and has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a non-controversial rule change, which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the SEC.

Proposed Amendments

The NASDAQ Listing Rules require that a listed company notify NASDAQ when an executive officer of such company becomes aware of any material noncompliance with NASDAQ’s corporate governance requirements contained in the Rule 5600 series. According to the SEC release, NASDAQ has consistently interpreted this notification requirement such that any noncompliance with the corporate governance requirements contained in the Rule 5600 series would be considered material. The proposed amendment to Rule 5625 would clarify this interpretation by NASDAQ by requiring notification of any noncompliance. The proposed amendments would also make conforming changes to Rule 5615(a)(3) and IM-5615-3, which, among other things, require a foreign private issuer to provide notice of noncompliance, and to Rule 5250, which cross references the requirement to provide notice of noncompliance.

Comments should be submitted within 21 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Click here for the full text of the proposed amendments.

SEC's Chief Accountant Testifies on Developments in Accounting and Auditing Standards

Co-authored by James B. Anderson

On May 21, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Chief Accountant, James Kroeker, testified on behalf of the SEC before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises of the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services. Mr. Kroeker discussed the status of the following accounting and auditing standards matters the SEC is working on with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

Continue Reading...

SEC Publishes Report from Forum on Small Business Capital Formation

Co-authored by Jonathan D. Weiner

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently published the Final Report from its Forum on Small Business Capital Formation, held in November 2009. The Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 requires the SEC to host an annual forum that focuses on the capital formation concerns of small businesses. The purposes of the forum are to provide a platform for small business to highlight perceived unnecessary impediments in the capital raising process and to develop recommendations for government and private action to improve the environment for small business capital formation. Participants in the forum, consisting of members of various business and professional organizations, developed and ranked 26 securities law recommendations, including the following:

Continue Reading...

CFTC-SEC Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues to Meet

Co-authored by Joshua A. Penner

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission have announced that the first meeting of the Joint CFTC-SEC Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues will be held on Monday, May 24.

The Joint Committee will discuss the preliminary findings of the staffs of the CFTC and SEC related to the unusual market events of May 6.

The meeting will be streamed live on the Internet at www.sec.gov.
The CFTC press release regarding the meeting can be found here.